<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gifted Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/gifted-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/gifted-children/</link>
	<description>Improving educational outcomes and wellbeing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/gifted-children/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/?p=510#comment-76</guid>
		<description>How subjective is the test? I have heard that it can be influenced by the tester up or down not only the childs skills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How subjective is the test? I have heard that it can be influenced by the tester up or down not only the childs skills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Jepsen</title>
		<link>http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/gifted-children/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Jepsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/?p=510#comment-62</guid>
		<description>@Kim
Thanks for the feedback. I agree and did not mean to imply these tests were in fact the ‘best’ in an absolute sense; only that they are commonly used and accepted around these parts. Post edited accordingly.

Deborah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kim<br />
Thanks for the feedback. I agree and did not mean to imply these tests were in fact the ‘best’ in an absolute sense; only that they are commonly used and accepted around these parts. Post edited accordingly.</p>
<p>Deborah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/gifted-children/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 02:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schoolpsychologyblog.com/?p=510#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I am a School Psychologist in Florida.  I have reservations about picking specific IQ tests and calling them &quot;the best.&quot;  That is, in fact, an opinion given that all cognitive ability assessments have extensive reliability factors that have been well researched.  I would caution you about using such specific language when advising parents or others that may visit your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a School Psychologist in Florida.  I have reservations about picking specific IQ tests and calling them &#8220;the best.&#8221;  That is, in fact, an opinion given that all cognitive ability assessments have extensive reliability factors that have been well researched.  I would caution you about using such specific language when advising parents or others that may visit your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

